↓ Skip to main content

Diagnostic Exome Sequencing to Elucidate the Genetic Basis of Likely Recessive Disorders in Consanguineous Families

Overview of attention for article published in Human Mutation, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diagnostic Exome Sequencing to Elucidate the Genetic Basis of Likely Recessive Disorders in Consanguineous Families
Published in
Human Mutation, August 2014
DOI 10.1002/humu.22617
Pubmed ID
Authors

Periklis Makrythanasis, Mari Nelis, Federico A. Santoni, Michel Guipponi, Anne Vannier, Frédérique Béna, Stefania Gimelli, Elisavet Stathaki, Samia Temtamy, André Mégarbané, Amira Masri, Mona S. Aglan, Maha S. Zaki, Armand Bottani, Siv Fokstuen, Lorraine Gwanmesia, Konstantinos Aliferis, Mariana Bustamante Eduardo, Georgios Stamoulis, Stavroula Psoni, Sofia Kitsiou‐Tzeli, Helen Fryssira, Emmanouil Kanavakis, Nasir Al‐Allawi, Abdelaziz Sefiani, Sana' Al Hait, Siham C. Elalaoui, Nadine Jalkh, Lihadh Al‐Gazali, Fatma Al‐Jasmi, Habiba Chaabouni Bouhamed, Ebtesam Abdalla, David N. Cooper, Hanan Hamamy, Stylianos E. Antonarakis

Abstract

Rare, atypical and undiagnosed autosomal recessive (AR) disorders frequently occur in the offspring of consanguineous couples. Current routine diagnostic genetic tests fail to establish a diagnosis in many cases. We employed exome sequencing to identify the underlying molecular defects in patients with unresolved but putatively AR disorders in consanguineous families and postulated that the pathogenic variants would reside within homozygous regions. Fifty consanguineous families participated in the study, with a wide spectrum of clinical phenotypes suggestive of AR inheritance, but with no definitive molecular diagnosis. DNA samples from the patient(s), unaffected sibling(s) and the parents were genotyped with a 720K SNP array. Exome sequencing and array CGH were then performed on one affected individual per family. High-confidence pathogenic variants were found in homozygosity in known disease-causing genes in 18 families (36%) (one by aCGH and 17 by exome sequencing), accounting for the clinical phenotype in whole or in part. In the remainder of the families, no causative variant in a known pathogenic gene was identified. Our study shows that exome sequencing, in addition to being a powerful diagnostic tool, promises to rapidly expand our knowledge of rare genetic Mendelian disorders and can be used to establish more detailed causative links between mutant genotypes and clinical phenotypes. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Unknown 84 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 16%
Professor 9 10%
Other 8 9%
Student > Master 8 9%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 15 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 21%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Philosophy 1 1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 19 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2014.
All research outputs
#19,944,091
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Human Mutation
#2,519
of 2,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,182
of 246,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Mutation
#15
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,982 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,633 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.