↓ Skip to main content

Sociosexuality Predicts Women’s Preferences for Symmetry in Men’s Faces

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Sexual Behavior, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Sociosexuality Predicts Women’s Preferences for Symmetry in Men’s Faces
Published in
Archives of Sexual Behavior, September 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10508-011-9848-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michelle C. Quist, Christopher D. Watkins, Finlay G. Smith, Anthony C. Little, Lisa M. DeBruine, Benedict C. Jones

Abstract

Although men displaying cues of good physical condition possess traits that are desirable in a mate (e.g., good health), these men are also more likely to possess antisocial characteristics that are undesirable in a long-term partner (e.g., aggression and tendency to infidelity). How women resolve this trade-off between the costs and benefits associated with choosing a mate in good physical condition may lead to strategic variation in women's mate preferences. Because the costs of choosing a mate with antisocial personality characteristics are greater in long- than short-term relationships, women's sociosexuality (i.e., the extent to which they are interested in uncommitted sexual relationships) may predict individual differences in their mate preferences. Here we investigated variation in 99 heterosexual women's preferences for facial symmetry, a characteristic that is thought to be an important cue of physical condition. Symmetry preferences were assessed using pairs of symmetrized and original (i.e., relatively asymmetric) versions of 10 male and 10 female faces. Analyses showed that women's sociosexuality, and their sociosexual attitude in particular, predicted their preferences for symmetry in men's, but not women's, faces; women who reported being more interested in short-term, uncommitted relationships demonstrated stronger attraction to symmetric men. Our findings present new evidence for potentially adaptive variation in women's symmetry preferences that is consistent with trade-off theories of attraction.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
United Kingdom 2 2%
France 2 2%
Austria 1 1%
Unknown 75 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 23%
Student > Master 16 19%
Student > Bachelor 12 14%
Researcher 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 13 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 45 54%
Social Sciences 9 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 6%
Computer Science 3 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 12 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2012.
All research outputs
#15,234,609
of 22,651,245 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#2,924
of 3,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,439
of 124,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#24
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,651,245 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,445 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.9. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,990 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.