↓ Skip to main content

MicroRNAs in Endothelial Senescence and Atherosclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
Title
MicroRNAs in Endothelial Senescence and Atherosclerosis
Published in
Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research, June 2013
DOI 10.1007/s12265-013-9487-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rossella Menghini, Viviana Casagrande, Massimo Federici

Abstract

Aging is an important risk factor for the development of many cardiovascular diseases as atherosclerosis and is accompanied by the decline of endothelial function. Senescence of endothelial cells has been proposed to be involved in endothelial dysfunction and atherogenesis. Therefore, the study of new target therapies to prevent or reverse this process represents a field of great interest. MicroRNAs (miRNAs), a class of short RNAs, play key roles in various biological processes and in the development of human disease through specific posttranscriptional downregulation of gene expression. In particular, miRNAs that are highly expressed by endothelial cells can be detected in high concentration in human atherosclerotic plaques and in the circulation, suggesting their potential translation to bedside to determine the dysfunction of specific signaling pathways which play a role in coronary artery disease in the individual patient, a path towards a stratified medicine approach for early preventive treatment of disease. Here, we review the most recent advances in the field of atherosclerosis that implicate a role for miRNAs with a special emphasis on endothelial senescence and its involvement in the atherosclerotic process. Finally, we briefly discuss the potential use of miRNAs signatures to map atherosclerosis progression and in particular underlying the relevance of circulating plasma miRNAs that can be used clinically as biomarkers of vascular pathology.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 16%
Student > Bachelor 6 14%
Researcher 5 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Other 13 30%
Unknown 4 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 21%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 8 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2014.
All research outputs
#20,233,066
of 22,758,963 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research
#494
of 576 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,258
of 195,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research
#10
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,963 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 576 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,241 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.