↓ Skip to main content

Quality of Life in Families of Children with Congenital Heart Disease

Overview of attention for chapter
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
89 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Chapter title
Quality of Life in Families of Children with Congenital Heart Disease
Published in
Quality of Life Research, October 2005
DOI 10.1007/s11136-005-4327-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lutz Goldbeck, Juliane Melches

Abstract

Within a family perspective on quality of life (QL) with congenital heart disease, the study investigates parental QL, and patients' health-related QL as reported by themselves and by their parents. We examined the hypotheses that parental QL moderates the parental proxy reports. Sixty-nine patients (7-20 years, 61% male) and their caregivers participated in a computer-assisted QL-assessment. Children's self-rated and proxy-rated QL correlated moderately, with the highest intra-class correlation on the subscale psychological well-being/functioning (r = 0.61; p < 0.001), less convergence in physical well-being/functioning (r = 0.49; p < 0.001) and absent correlation in the evaluation of intra-family relationships. Parental QL was correlated both with the children's self-rated QL (r = 0.42; p < 0.05) and children's parent-rated QL (r = 0.60; p < 0.001). Support for the moderator hypotheses is indicated by the results of regression analyses demonstrating a significant interaction effect of parental QL and patients' self-reported QL in predicting parental proxy reports on their children's QL. Post-hoc tests reveal that parents with low own QL agree significantly more with their children than parents with high QL. Parent-child agreement on the children's QL is limited and reflects complementary subjective viewpoints. Psychosocial interventions should be family-focused and provide support for patients' and their caregivers' QL.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 81 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 13%
Student > Master 11 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 11%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 7 8%
Other 21 25%
Unknown 14 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 22 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 20%
Social Sciences 5 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 15 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2011.
All research outputs
#14,136,253
of 22,651,245 outputs
Outputs from Quality of Life Research
#1,439
of 2,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,377
of 59,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quality of Life Research
#10
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,651,245 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,839 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,089 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.