↓ Skip to main content

Origin of giant viruses from smaller DNA viruses not from a fourth domain of cellular life

Overview of attention for article published in Virology, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 9,498)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
42 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
45 X users
wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
142 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
229 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Origin of giant viruses from smaller DNA viruses not from a fourth domain of cellular life
Published in
Virology, July 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.virol.2014.06.032
Pubmed ID
Authors

Natalya Yutin, Yuri I. Wolf, Eugene V. Koonin

Abstract

The numerous and diverse eukaryotic viruses with large double-stranded DNA genomes that at least partially reproduce in the cytoplasm of infected cells apparently evolved from a single virus ancestor. This major group of viruses is known as Nucleocytoplasmic Large DNA Viruses (NCLDV) or the proposed order Megavirales. Among the "Megavirales", there are three groups of giant viruses with genomes exceeding 500kb, namely Mimiviruses, Pithoviruses, and Pandoraviruses that hold the current record of viral genome size, about 2.5Mb. Phylogenetic analysis of conserved, ancestral NLCDV genes clearly shows that these three groups of giant viruses have three distinct origins within the "Megavirales". The Mimiviruses constitute a distinct family that is distantly related to Phycodnaviridae, Pandoraviruses originate from a common ancestor with Coccolithoviruses within the Phycodnaviridae family, and Pithoviruses are related to Iridoviridae and Marseilleviridae. Maximum likelihood reconstruction of gene gain and loss events during the evolution of the "Megavirales" indicates that each group of giant viruses evolved from viruses with substantially smaller and simpler gene repertoires. Initial phylogenetic analysis of universal genes, such as translation system components, encoded by some giant viruses, in particular Mimiviruses, has led to the hypothesis that giant viruses descend from a fourth, probably extinct domain of cellular life. The results of our comprehensive phylogenomic analysis of giant viruses refute the fourth domain hypothesis and instead indicate that the universal genes have been independently acquired by different giant viruses from their eukaryotic hosts.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 229 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 217 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 19%
Student > Bachelor 41 18%
Student > Master 36 16%
Researcher 28 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 5%
Other 30 13%
Unknown 38 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 102 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 44 19%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 3%
Computer Science 7 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 2%
Other 15 7%
Unknown 49 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 397. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2023.
All research outputs
#76,130
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Virology
#3
of 9,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#570
of 227,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virology
#1
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,498 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,501 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.