You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Association of Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease with Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS Medicine, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001680 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Giovanni Musso, Roberto Gambino, James H. Tabibian, Mattias Ekstedt, Stergios Kechagias, Masahide Hamaguchi, Rolf Hultcrantz, Hannes Hagström, Seung Kew Yoon, Phunchai Charatcharoenwitthaya, Jacob George, Francisco Barrera, Svanhildur Hafliðadóttir, Einar Stefan Björnsson, Matthew J. Armstrong, Laurence J. Hopkins, Xin Gao, Sven Francque, An Verrijken, Yusuf Yilmaz, Keith D. Lindor, Michael Charlton, Robin Haring, Markus M. Lerch, Rainer Rettig, Henry Völzke, Seungho Ryu, Guolin Li, Linda L. Wong, Mariana Machado, Helena Cortez-Pinto, Kohichiroh Yasui, Maurizio Cassader |
| Abstract |
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a frequent, under-recognized condition and a risk factor for renal failure and cardiovascular disease. Increasing evidence connects non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) to CKD. We conducted a meta-analysis to determine whether the presence and severity of NAFLD are associated with the presence and severity of CKD. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 11% |
| United States | 4 | 11% |
| Chile | 3 | 8% |
| Russia | 2 | 6% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Ukraine | 1 | 3% |
| Egypt | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 17 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 30 | 83% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 11% |
| Scientists | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 397 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Uruguay | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 388 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 54 | 14% |
| Researcher | 51 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 27 | 7% |
| Other | 89 | 22% |
| Unknown | 104 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 152 | 38% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 34 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 43 | 11% |
| Unknown | 130 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 85. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2024.
All research outputs
#502,047
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from PLOS Medicine
#825
of 5,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,518
of 239,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS Medicine
#17
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,161 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 77.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,414 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.