↓ Skip to main content

The effect of pathophysiology on pharmacokinetics in the critically ill patient — Concepts appraised by the example of antimicrobial agents

Overview of attention for article published in Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
9 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
348 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
404 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effect of pathophysiology on pharmacokinetics in the critically ill patient — Concepts appraised by the example of antimicrobial agents
Published in
Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, July 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.addr.2014.07.006
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stijn I. Blot, Federico Pea, Jeffrey Lipman

Abstract

Critically ill patients are at high risk for development of life-threatening infection leading to sepsis and multiple organ failure. Adequate antimicrobial therapy is pivotal for optimizing the chances of survival. However, efficient dosing is problematic because pathophysiological changes associated with critical illness impact on pharmacokinetics of mainly hydrophilic antimicrobials. Concentrations of hydrophilic antimicrobials may be increased because of decreased renal clearance due to acute kidney injury. Alternatively, antimicrobial concentrations may be decreased because of increased volume of distribution and augmented renal clearance provoked by systemic inflammatory response syndrome, capillary leak, decreased protein binding and administration of intravenous fluids and inotropes. Often multiple conditions that may influence pharmacokinetics are present at the same time thereby excessively complicating the prediction of adequate concentrations. In general, conditions leading to underdosing are predominant. Yet, since prediction of serum concentrations remains difficult, therapeutic drug monitoring for individual fine-tuning of antimicrobial therapy seems the way forward.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 404 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 397 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 60 15%
Student > Bachelor 52 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 11%
Researcher 42 10%
Student > Postgraduate 39 10%
Other 87 22%
Unknown 79 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 144 36%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 109 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 1%
Other 27 7%
Unknown 103 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2022.
All research outputs
#1,518,319
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews
#74
of 3,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,737
of 242,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews
#2
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,263 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,374 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.