↓ Skip to main content

Maternal reproductive history, fertility treatments and folic acid supplementation in the risk of childhood acute leukemia: the ESTELLE Study

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Causes & Control, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
Title
Maternal reproductive history, fertility treatments and folic acid supplementation in the risk of childhood acute leukemia: the ESTELLE Study
Published in
Cancer Causes & Control, July 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10552-014-0429-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roula Ajrouche, Jérémie Rudant, Laurent Orsi, Arnaud Petit, André Baruchel, Brigitte Nelken, Marlène Pasquet, Gérard Michel, Christophe Bergeron, Stéphane Ducassou, Virginie Gandemer, Patrick Lutz, Laure Saumet, Xavier Rialland, Denis Hémon, Jacqueline Clavel

Abstract

To investigate the potential involvement of fertility treatments and other conditions of becoming pregnant (infertility, getting pregnant on birth control, maternal history of fetal loss) and folic acid supplements in the etiology of childhood leukemia (CL).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 77 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 16%
Student > Bachelor 11 14%
Student > Master 9 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 17 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 13%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 19 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2023.
All research outputs
#7,381,450
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Causes & Control
#859
of 2,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,710
of 229,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Causes & Control
#12
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,187 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,604 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.