↓ Skip to main content

Sensory impairment after stroke: Exploring therapists’ clinical decision making

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sensory impairment after stroke: Exploring therapists’ clinical decision making
Published in
Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, July 2014
DOI 10.1177/0008417414540516
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susan D. Doyle, Sally Bennett, Brian J. Dudgeon

Abstract

Stroke survivors experience sensory impairments that significantly limit upper-limb functional use. Lack of clear research-based guidelines about their management exacerbates the uncertainty in occupational therapists' decision making to support these clients. This study explores occupational therapists' clinical decision making regarding upper-limb, post-stroke sensory impairments that can ultimately inform approaches to support therapists working with such clients. Twelve therapists participated in a qualitative descriptive study. Transcripts of semi-structured interviews were analyzed using content analysis. Three overarching categories were identified: deciding on the focus of interventions (describing intervention choices), it all depends (outlining factors considered when choosing interventions), and managing uncertainty in decision making (describing uncertainty and actions taken to resolve it). Providing training about post-stroke sensory impairment and decision making may improve therapists' decision making and ultimately improve client outcomes. Further research is needed to understand the impact of uncertainty on occupational therapy decision making and resulting care practices.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 4%
Unknown 24 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 24%
Student > Master 2 8%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Other 5 20%
Unknown 6 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 9 36%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 16%
Neuroscience 2 8%
Psychology 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 7 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2014.
All research outputs
#13,542,652
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy
#225
of 435 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,207
of 227,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 435 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,572 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.