↓ Skip to main content

Negotiating face-to-face: Men's facial structure predicts negotiation performance

Overview of attention for article published in Leadership Quarterly, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#35 of 869)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
10 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Negotiating face-to-face: Men's facial structure predicts negotiation performance
Published in
Leadership Quarterly, October 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.12.003
Authors

Michael P. Haselhuhn, Elaine M. Wong, Margaret E. Ormiston, M. Ena Inesi, Adam D. Galinsky

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Luxembourg 1 <1%
Unknown 148 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 27%
Student > Master 21 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 8%
Student > Bachelor 11 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 6%
Other 34 22%
Unknown 27 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 48 31%
Psychology 40 25%
Social Sciences 15 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 8 5%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 30 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 111. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2019.
All research outputs
#376,469
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Leadership Quarterly
#35
of 869 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,637
of 265,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Leadership Quarterly
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 869 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,638 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.