↓ Skip to main content

Macrophage subsets and microglia in multiple sclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Neuropathologica, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
222 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
372 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Macrophage subsets and microglia in multiple sclerosis
Published in
Acta Neuropathologica, June 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00401-014-1310-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeroen F. J. Bogie, Piet Stinissen, Jerome J. A. Hendriks

Abstract

Along with microglia and monocyte-derived macrophages, macrophages in the perivascular space, choroid plexus, and meninges are the principal effector cells in neuroinflammatory and neurodegenerative disorders. These phagocytes are highly heterogeneous cells displaying spatial- and temporal-dependent identities in the healthy, injured, and inflamed CNS. In the last decade, researchers have debated on whether phagocytes subtypes and phenotypes are pathogenic or protective in CNS pathologies. In the context of this dichotomy, we summarize and discuss the current knowledge on the spatiotemporal physiology of macrophage subsets and microglia in the healthy and diseased CNS, and elaborate on factors regulating their behavior. In addition, the impact of macrophages present in lymphoid organs on CNS pathologies is defined. The prime focus of this review is on multiple sclerosis (MS), which is characterized by inflammation, demyelination, neurodegeneration, and CNS repair, and in which microglia and macrophages have been extensively scrutinized. On one hand, microglia and macrophages promote neuroinflammatory and neurodegenerative events in MS by releasing inflammatory mediators and stimulating leukocyte activity and infiltration into the CNS. On the other hand, microglia and macrophages assist in CNS repair through the production of neurotrophic factors and clearance of inhibitory myelin debris. Finally, we define how microglia and macrophage physiology can be harnessed for new therapeutics aimed at suppressing neuroinflammatory and cytodegenerative events, as well as promoting CNS repair. We conclude that microglia and macrophages are highly dynamic cells displaying disease stage and location-specific fates in neurological disorders. Changing the physiology of divergent phagocyte subsets at particular disease stages holds promise for future therapeutics for CNS pathologies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 372 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 364 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 74 20%
Student > Master 58 16%
Student > Bachelor 57 15%
Researcher 43 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 6%
Other 53 14%
Unknown 64 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 63 17%
Neuroscience 58 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 57 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 49 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 30 8%
Other 34 9%
Unknown 81 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2022.
All research outputs
#5,076,192
of 24,072,790 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica
#1,105
of 2,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,061
of 232,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica
#13
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,072,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,447 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,381 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.