You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Europace, September 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1093/europace/eux274 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hugh Calkins, Gerhard Hindricks, Riccardo Cappato, Young-Hoon Kim, Eduardo B Saad, Luis Aguinaga, Joseph G Akar, Vinay Badhwar, Josep Brugada, John Camm, Peng-Sheng Chen, Shih-Ann Chen, Mina K Chung, Jens Cosedis Nielsen, Anne B Curtis, D Wyn Davies, John D Day, André d’Avila, N M S de Groot, Luigi Di Biase, Mattias Duytschaever, James R Edgerton, Kenneth A Ellenbogen, Patrick T Ellinor, Sabine Ernst, Guilherme Fenelon, Edward P Gerstenfeld, David E Haines, Michel Haissaguerre, Robert H Helm, Elaine Hylek, Warren M Jackman, Jose Jalife, Jonathan M Kalman, Josef Kautzner, Hans Kottkamp, Karl Heinz Kuck, Koichiro Kumagai, Richard Lee, Thorsten Lewalter, Bruce D Lindsay, Laurent Macle, Moussa Mansour, Francis E Marchlinski, Gregory F Michaud, Hiroshi Nakagawa, Andrea Natale, Stanley Nattel, Ken Okumura, Douglas Packer, Evgeny Pokushalov, Matthew R Reynolds, Prashanthan Sanders, Mauricio Scanavacca, Richard Schilling, Claudio Tondo, Hsuan-Ming Tsao, Atul Verma, David J Wilber, Teiichi Yamane, Carina Blomström-Lundqvist, Angelo A V De Paola, Peter M Kistler, Gregory Y H Lip, Nicholas S Peters, Cristiano F Pisani, Antonio Raviele, Eduardo B Saad, Kazuhiro Satomi, Martin K Stiles, Stephan Willems |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 11 | 27% |
| Turkey | 2 | 5% |
| Mexico | 2 | 5% |
| Portugal | 2 | 5% |
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Egypt | 1 | 2% |
| Dominican Republic | 1 | 2% |
| Peru | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 15% |
| Unknown | 12 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 29 | 71% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 10% |
| Scientists | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 574 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 574 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 54 | 9% |
| Researcher | 50 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 50 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 50 | 9% |
| Other | 43 | 7% |
| Other | 125 | 22% |
| Unknown | 202 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 209 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 33 | 6% |
| Engineering | 21 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 10 | 2% |
| Other | 60 | 10% |
| Unknown | 231 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 70. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2024.
All research outputs
#620,175
of 25,734,859 outputs
Outputs from Europace
#69
of 3,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,785
of 324,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Europace
#2
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,734,859 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,124 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,370 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.