| Title |
The Role of Intra-Session Exercise Sequence in the Interference Effect: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Sports Medicine, September 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40279-017-0784-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lee Eddens, Ken van Someren, Glyn Howatson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 77 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 13% |
| Spain | 10 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 10% |
| Canada | 3 | 4% |
| Chile | 3 | 4% |
| Ireland | 3 | 4% |
| France | 2 | 3% |
| Brazil | 2 | 3% |
| Argentina | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 28 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 54 | 70% |
| Scientists | 19 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 319 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 319 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 59 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 50 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 12% |
| Researcher | 20 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 5% |
| Other | 50 | 16% |
| Unknown | 85 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 138 | 43% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 26 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 19 | 6% |
| Unknown | 94 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 221. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2024.
All research outputs
#173,880
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#162
of 2,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,724
of 323,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#5
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,875 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,344 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.