↓ Skip to main content

Environmental influences on African migration to Canada: focus group findings from Ottawa-Gatineau

Overview of attention for article published in Population and Environment, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
Title
Environmental influences on African migration to Canada: focus group findings from Ottawa-Gatineau
Published in
Population and Environment, July 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11111-014-0214-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luisa Veronis, Robert McLeman

Abstract

There is limited empirical evidence of how environmental conditions in the Global South may influence long-distance international migration to the Global North. This research note reports findings from seven focus groups held in Ottawa-Gatineau, Canada, with recent migrants from the Horn of Africa and francophone sub-Saharan Africa, where the role of environment in migration decision-making was discussed. Participants stated that those most affected by environmental challenges in their home countries lack the financial wherewithal to migrate to Canada. Participants also suggested that internal rural-urban migration patterns generated by environmental challenges in their home countries underlay socioeconomic factors that contributed to their own migration. In other words, environment is a second- or third-order contributor in a complex chain of interactions in the migrant source country that may lead to long-distance international migration by skilled and educated urbanites. These findings have informed the scope and detail of a larger, ongoing empirical study of environmental influences on immigration to Canada.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 70 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 15%
Researcher 11 15%
Student > Master 9 13%
Student > Bachelor 9 13%
Lecturer 4 6%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 18 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 24 33%
Environmental Science 10 14%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 4%
Computer Science 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 22 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2021.
All research outputs
#4,902,784
of 25,643,886 outputs
Outputs from Population and Environment
#133
of 356 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,643
of 241,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Population and Environment
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,643,886 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 356 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,475 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.