| Title |
Radioactive Seed Localization Versus Wire-Guided Localization for Nonpalpable Breast Cancer: A Cost and Operating Room Efficiency Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Surgical Oncology, September 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1245/s10434-017-6084-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yimeng Zhang, Jean Seely, Erin Cordeiro, Joshua Hefler, Kednapa Thavorn, Mukta Mahajan, Sue Domina, Jon Aro, Andrea Marie Ibrahim, Angel Arnaout, Denis Gravel, Carolyn Nessim |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 43% |
| Canada | 2 | 29% |
| South Sudan | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 29% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 62 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 15% |
| Researcher | 9 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 11% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 24 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 37% |
| Engineering | 3 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 26 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2017.
All research outputs
#6,603,000
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#2,145
of 7,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,721
of 326,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#49
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,543 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,889 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.