↓ Skip to main content

Nanoparticle ζ-potential measurements using tunable resistive pulse sensing with variable pressure

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Colloid & Interface Science, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nanoparticle ζ-potential measurements using tunable resistive pulse sensing with variable pressure
Published in
Journal of Colloid & Interface Science, May 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.jcis.2014.05.013
Pubmed ID
Authors

James A. Eldridge, Geoff R. Willmott, Will Anderson, Robert Vogel

Abstract

Modern resistive pulse sensing techniques can be used to measure nanoparticle electrophoretic mobility, and hence ζ-potential. In contrast to conventional light scattering methods, resistive pulse sensing produces particle-by-particle data. We have used tunable resistive pulse sensing (TRPS) to compare methods for measuring the ζ-potential of carboxylated polystyrene nanoparticles. The five particle sets studied had nominal surface charge density (σ) between 0 and -0.67Cm(-2), and diameters in the range 160-230nm. Data were collected with pressure in the range ±500Pa applied across a tunable pore. In each experiment, pressure was varied either continuously or in discrete steps. Calculations of the ζ-potential were obtained by analysing both the rate and the full-width half maximum duration of resistive pulses. Data obtained from duration analyses were more reproducible than rate methods, yielding typical variations smaller than ±5mV. When σ was greater (less negative) than -0.32Cm(-2), all of the analysis methods studied yielded a monotonic relationship between ζ-potential and σ. Complicated pulse data were observed near the pressure at which the net particle flux is zero, and these observations have been explored by examining competition between electrokinetic and pressure-driven transport. The typical difference between ζ-potentials obtained using TRPS and phase analysis light scattering was 15% (<5mV), with an experimental error of ∼10% attributable to both techniques.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 3%
United Kingdom 1 3%
New Zealand 1 3%
Denmark 1 3%
Unknown 32 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 31%
Student > Master 6 17%
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Postgraduate 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 4 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 12 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 8%
Physics and Astronomy 3 8%
Materials Science 3 8%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 4 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2014.
All research outputs
#7,355,930
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Colloid & Interface Science
#1,218
of 5,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,144
of 239,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Colloid & Interface Science
#7
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,980 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,999 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.