↓ Skip to main content

The Gluten-Free, Casein-Free Diet In Autism: Results of A Preliminary Double Blind Clinical Trial

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, March 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
8 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
13 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
226 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
343 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
The Gluten-Free, Casein-Free Diet In Autism: Results of A Preliminary Double Blind Clinical Trial
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, March 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10803-006-0079-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer Harrison Elder, Meena Shankar, Jonathan Shuster, Douglas Theriaque, Sylvia Burns, Lindsay Sherrill

Abstract

This study tested the efficacy of a gluten-free and casein-free (GFCF) diet in treating autism using a randomized, double blind repeated measures crossover design. The sample included 15 children aged 2-16 years with autism spectrum disorder. Data on autistic symptoms and urinary peptide levels were collected in the subjects' homes over the 12 weeks that they were on the diet. Group data indicated no statistically significant findings even though several parents reported improvement in their children. Although preliminary, this study demonstrates how a controlled clinical trial of the GFCF diet can be conducted, and suggests directions for future research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 343 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 1%
Cyprus 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 333 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 85 25%
Student > Master 51 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 8%
Researcher 25 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 6%
Other 76 22%
Unknown 57 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 71 21%
Psychology 52 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 7%
Social Sciences 22 6%
Other 60 17%
Unknown 70 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 84. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2023.
All research outputs
#506,902
of 25,372,398 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#142
of 5,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#702
of 85,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#1
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,372,398 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,447 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 85,869 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.