↓ Skip to main content

Genome-wide Profiling of AP-1–Regulated Transcription Provides Insights into the Invasiveness of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Research, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
102 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genome-wide Profiling of AP-1–Regulated Transcription Provides Insights into the Invasiveness of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
Published in
Cancer Research, July 2014
DOI 10.1158/0008-5472.can-13-3396
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chunyan Zhao, Yichun Qiao, Philip Jonsson, Jian Wang, Li Xu, Pegah Rouhi, Indranil Sinha, Yihai Cao, Cecilia Williams, Karin Dahlman-Wright

Abstract

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive clinical subtype accounting for up to 20% of all breast cancers, but its malignant determinants remain largely undefined. Here, we show that in TNBC the overexpression of Fra-1, a component of the transcription factor AP-1, offers prognostic potential. Fra-1 depletion or its heterodimeric partner c-Jun inhibits the proliferative and invasive phenotypes of TNBC cells in vitro. Similarly, RNAi-mediated attenuation of Fra-1 or c-Jun reduced cellular invasion in vivo in a zebrafish tumor xenograft model. Exploring the AP-1 cistrome and the AP-1-regulated transcriptome, we obtained insights into the transcriptional regulatory networks of AP-1 in TNBC cells. Among the direct targets identified for Fra-1/c-Jun involved in proliferation, adhesion, and cell-cell contact, we found that AP-1 repressed the expression of E-cadherin by transcriptional upregulation of ZEB2 to stimulate cell invasion. Overall, this work illuminates the pathways through which TNBC cells acquire invasive and proliferative properties. Cancer Res; 74(14); 3983-94. ©2014 AACR.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 120 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 26%
Researcher 26 22%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Student > Master 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 23 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 36 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 26 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2014.
All research outputs
#15,940,870
of 25,225,182 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Research
#14,824
of 19,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,785
of 233,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Research
#83
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,225,182 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,127 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,606 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.