You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Global Burden of Disease Study 2010: Interpretation and Implications for the Neglected Tropical Diseases
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002865 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter J. Hotez, Miriam Alvarado, María-Gloria Basáñez, Ian Bolliger, Rupert Bourne, Michel Boussinesq, Simon J. Brooker, Ami Shah Brown, Geoffrey Buckle, Christine M. Budke, Hélène Carabin, Luc E. Coffeng, Eric M. Fèvre, Thomas Fürst, Yara A. Halasa, Rashmi Jasrasaria, Nicole E. Johns, Jennifer Keiser, Charles H. King, Rafael Lozano, Michele E. Murdoch, Simon O'Hanlon, Sébastien D. S. Pion, Rachel L. Pullan, Kapa D. Ramaiah, Thomas Roberts, Donald S. Shepard, Jennifer L. Smith, Wilma A. Stolk, Eduardo A. Undurraga, Jürg Utzinger, Mengru Wang, Christopher J. L. Murray, Mohsen Naghavi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 85 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 19 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 6% |
| Canada | 4 | 5% |
| Argentina | 3 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Mexico | 2 | 2% |
| Ireland | 2 | 2% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 39 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 55 | 65% |
| Scientists | 15 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| Kenya | 3 | <1% |
| Ecuador | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Ethiopia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1156 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 229 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 159 | 13% |
| Researcher | 152 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 151 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 52 | 4% |
| Other | 175 | 15% |
| Unknown | 262 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 209 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 187 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 115 | 10% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 80 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 51 | 4% |
| Other | 243 | 21% |
| Unknown | 295 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 185. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2022.
All research outputs
#216,898
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#97
of 9,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,734
of 240,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#5
of 187 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,402 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,163 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 187 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.