↓ Skip to main content

The effectiveness of Grief-Help, a cognitive behavioural treatment for prolonged grief in children: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
260 Mendeley
Title
The effectiveness of Grief-Help, a cognitive behavioural treatment for prolonged grief in children: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
Published in
Trials, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-14-395
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mariken Spuij, Peter Prinzie, Maja Dekovic, Jan van den Bout, Paul A Boelen

Abstract

There is growing recognition of a syndrome of disturbed grief referred to as prolonged grief disorder (PGD). PGD is mostly studied in adults, but clinically significant PGD symptoms have also been observed in children and adolescents. Yet, to date no effective treatment for childhood PGD exists. The aims of this study are: (1) to investigate the effectiveness of Grief-Help, a nine-session cognitive-behavioural treatment for childhood PGD, combined with five sessions of parental counselling, immediately after the treatment and at three, six and twelve months follow-up; (2) to examine tentative mediators of the effects of Grief-Help, (i.e., maladaptive cognitions and behaviours and positive parenting), and (3) to determine whether demographic variables, child personality, as well as symptoms of PGD, anxiety, and depression in parents moderate the treatment effectiveness.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 260 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 259 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 48 18%
Researcher 32 12%
Student > Bachelor 26 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 6%
Other 40 15%
Unknown 77 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 85 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 31 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 7%
Social Sciences 16 6%
Neuroscience 6 2%
Other 21 8%
Unknown 84 32%