↓ Skip to main content

Fatigue and Pacing in High-Intensity Intermittent Team Sport: An Update

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
33 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
118 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
229 Mendeley
Title
Fatigue and Pacing in High-Intensity Intermittent Team Sport: An Update
Published in
Sports Medicine, July 2014
DOI 10.1007/s40279-014-0230-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark Waldron, Jamie Highton

Abstract

With the advancements in player tracking technology, the topic of fatigue and pacing in team sport has become increasingly popular in recent years. Initially based upon a pre-conceived pacing schema, a central metabolic control system is proposed to guide the movement of players during team sport matches, which can be consciously modified based on afferent signals from the various physiological systems and in response to environmental cues. On the basis of this theory, coupled with the collective findings from motion-analysis research, we sought to define the different pacing strategies employed by team sport players. Whole-match players adopt a 'slow-positive' pacing profile (gradual decline in total running intensity), which appears to be global across the different team sports. High-intensity movement also declines in a 'slow-positive' manner across most team sport matches. The duration of the exercise bout appears to be important for the selected exercise intensity, with the first introduction to a match as a substitute or interchange player resulting in a 'one bout, all out' strategy. In a limited interchange environment, a second introduction to the match results in a 'second-bout reserve' strategy; otherwise, the 'one bout, all out' strategy is likely to be adopted. These pacing profiles are proposed to reflect the presence of a central regulator that controls the movement intensity of the player to optimize performance, as well as avoiding the harmful failure of any physiological system. The presence of 'temporary fatigue' reflects this process, whereby exercise intensity is consciously modulated from within the framework of a global pacing schema.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 229 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 221 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 44 19%
Student > Master 32 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 11%
Researcher 17 7%
Lecturer 10 4%
Other 49 21%
Unknown 52 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 141 62%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 1%
Social Sciences 2 <1%
Other 10 4%
Unknown 59 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2020.
All research outputs
#1,526,190
of 22,725,280 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#1,158
of 2,700 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,474
of 228,495 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#23
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,725,280 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,700 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 50.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,495 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.