Title |
Total Skin-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction: An Evolution of Technique and Assessment of Outcomes
|
---|---|
Published in |
Annals of Surgical Oncology, July 2014
|
DOI | 10.1245/s10434-014-3915-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Frederick Wang, Anne Warren Peled, Elisabeth Garwood, Allison Stover Fiscalini, Hani Sbitany, Robert D. Foster, Michael Alvarado, Cheryl Ewing, E. Shelley Hwang, Laura J. Esserman |
Abstract |
Total skin-sparing mastectomy (TSSM) with preservation of the breast and nipple-areolar complex (NAC) skin was developed to improve aesthetic outcomes for mastectomy. Over time, indications for TSSM broadened and our technique has evolved with a series of systematic improvements. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 1% |
Italy | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 71 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 13 | 18% |
Researcher | 8 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 10% |
Other | 5 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 7% |
Other | 13 | 18% |
Unknown | 22 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 58% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Chemistry | 2 | 3% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 1% |
Other | 2 | 3% |
Unknown | 22 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2014.
All research outputs
#18,375,064
of 22,758,963 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#4,969
of 6,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,350
of 228,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#72
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,963 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,446 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,654 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.