| Title |
A Systematic Review of the Impact of Patient and Public Involvement on Service Users, Researchers and Communities
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40271-014-0065-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jo Brett, Sophie Staniszewska, Carole Mockford, Sandra Herron-Marx, John Hughes, Colin Tysall, Rashida Suleman |
| Abstract |
Patient and public involvement (PPI) in research has expanded nationally and internationally over the last decade, and recently there has been significant attention given to understanding its impact on research. Less attention has been given to the impact of PPI on the people involved, yet it has been shown that the success of PPI in research can be reliant on the processes of engagement between these individuals and communities. This paper therefore critically explores the impact of PPI on service users, researchers and communities involved in health and social care research. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 73 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 37 | 51% |
| Canada | 5 | 7% |
| United States | 3 | 4% |
| Greece | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 19 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 39 | 53% |
| Scientists | 25 | 34% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 516 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 507 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 90 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 69 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 64 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 25 | 5% |
| Other | 87 | 17% |
| Unknown | 148 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 99 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 64 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 58 | 11% |
| Psychology | 54 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 2% |
| Other | 68 | 13% |
| Unknown | 162 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2023.
All research outputs
#695,669
of 25,724,500 outputs
Outputs from The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
#6
of 595 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,452
of 240,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,724,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 595 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,447 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.