↓ Skip to main content

Shame, scientist! Degradation rituals in science

Overview of attention for article published in Prometheus, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Shame, scientist! Degradation rituals in science
Published in
Prometheus, June 2010
DOI 10.1080/08109028.2010.494866
Authors

Sandrine Thérèse, Brian Martin

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 4%
South Africa 1 4%
Australia 1 4%
Unknown 21 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Researcher 3 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 13%
Student > Master 3 13%
Other 6 25%
Unknown 3 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 6 25%
Social Sciences 5 21%
Arts and Humanities 2 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 5 21%
Unknown 4 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2014.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Prometheus
#161
of 197 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,999
of 105,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Prometheus
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 197 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,100 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them