↓ Skip to main content

Why does famine persist in Africa?

Overview of attention for article published in Food Security, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
101 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
292 Mendeley
Title
Why does famine persist in Africa?
Published in
Food Security, January 2009
DOI 10.1007/s12571-008-0005-8
Authors

Stephen Devereux

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 292 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 1%
United States 3 1%
Canada 3 1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 278 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 83 28%
Student > Bachelor 47 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 11%
Researcher 31 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 5%
Other 42 14%
Unknown 42 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 84 29%
Environmental Science 36 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 26 9%
Arts and Humanities 12 4%
Other 47 16%
Unknown 57 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2017.
All research outputs
#7,444,997
of 22,758,963 outputs
Outputs from Food Security
#443
of 734 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,535
of 170,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Food Security
#6
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,963 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 734 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,555 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.