↓ Skip to main content

Rationale and design of the SOluble guanylate Cyclase stimulatoR in heArT failurE Studies (SOCRATES)

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Heart Failure, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
121 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rationale and design of the SOluble guanylate Cyclase stimulatoR in heArT failurE Studies (SOCRATES)
Published in
European Journal of Heart Failure, July 2014
DOI 10.1002/ejhf.135
Pubmed ID
Authors

Burkert Pieske, Javed Butler, Gerasimos Filippatos, Carolyn Lam, Aldo Pietro Maggioni, Piotr Ponikowski, Sanjiv Shah, Scott Solomon, Elisabeth Kraigher‐Krainer, Eliana Tibana Samano, Andrea Viviana Scalise, Katharina Müller, Lothar Roessig, Mihai Gheorghiade, on behalf of the SOCRATES Investigators and Coordinators

Abstract

The clinical outcomes for patients with worsening chronic heart failure (WCHF) remain exceedingly poor despite contemporary evidence-based therapies, and effective therapies are urgently needed. Accumulating evidence supports augmentation of cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) signalling as a potential therapeutic strategy for HF with reduced or preserved ejection fraction (HFrEF and HFpEF, respectively). Direct soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC) stimulators target reduced cGMP generation due to insufficient sGC stimulation and represent a promising method for cGMP enhancement.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ukraine 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 114 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 11%
Other 12 10%
Professor 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Other 20 17%
Unknown 38 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 48%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Chemistry 2 2%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 42 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,910,661
of 24,814,419 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Heart Failure
#497
of 2,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,933
of 234,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Heart Failure
#3
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,814,419 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,452 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 234,284 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.