Title |
Correlation of Knee and Hindfoot Deformities in Advanced Knee OA: Compensatory Hindfoot Alignment and Where It Occurs
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, January 2015
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11999-014-3801-9 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Adam A. Norton, John J. Callaghan, Annunziato Amendola, Phinit Phisitkul, Siwadol Wongsak, Steve S. Liu, Catherine FruehlingWall |
Abstract |
Many patients undergoing TKA have both knee and ankle pathology, and it seems likely that some compensatory changes occur at each joint in response to deformity at the other. However, it is not fully understood how the foot and ankle compensate for a given varus or valgus deformity of the knee. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 134 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 15 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 10% |
Student > Master | 13 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 9% |
Other | 33 | 25% |
Unknown | 36 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 52 | 39% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 7% |
Engineering | 5 | 4% |
Sports and Recreations | 3 | 2% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 1% |
Other | 9 | 7% |
Unknown | 54 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2016.
All research outputs
#16,721,208
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#5,354
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,889
of 359,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#75
of 138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,528 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.