↓ Skip to main content

Hair Metabolomics: Identification of Fetal Compromise Provides Proof of Concept for Biomarker Discovery

Overview of attention for article published in Theranostics, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hair Metabolomics: Identification of Fetal Compromise Provides Proof of Concept for Biomarker Discovery
Published in
Theranostics, July 2014
DOI 10.7150/thno.9265
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karolina Sulek, Ting-Li Han, Silas Granato Villas-Boas, David Scott Wishart, Shu-E Soh, Kenneth Kwek, Peter David Gluckman, Yap-Seng Chong, Louise Claire Kenny, Philip Newton Baker

Abstract

Analysis of the human metabolome has yielded valuable insights into health, disease and toxicity. However, the metabolic profile of complex biological fluids such as blood is highly dynamic and this has limited the discovery of robust biomarkers. Hair grows relatively slowly, and both endogenous compounds and environmental exposures are incorporated from blood into hair during growth, which reflects the average chemical composition over several months. We used hair samples to study the metabolite profiles of women with pregnancies complicated by fetal growth restriction (FGR) and healthy matched controls. We report the use of GC-MS metabolite profiling of hair samples for biomarker discovery. Unsupervised statistical analysis showed complete discrimination of FGR from controls based on hair composition alone. A predictive model combining 5 metabolites produced an area under the receiver-operating curve of 0.998. This is the first study of the metabolome of human hair and demonstrates that this biological material contains robust biomarkers, which may lead to the development of a sensitive diagnostic tool for FGR, and perhaps more importantly, to stable biomarkers for a range of other diseases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 85 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 20%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Student > Master 10 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 14 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 13%
Chemistry 6 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 5%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 16 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2017.
All research outputs
#20,656,820
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Theranostics
#1,433
of 2,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,249
of 239,885 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theranostics
#12
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,107 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,885 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.