| Title |
Abstracts
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, September 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1046/j.1525-1497.17.s1.9.x |
| Pubmed ID |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 84 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 10% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 5% |
| Researcher | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Unknown | 44 | 52% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 45 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2015.
All research outputs
#4,761,537
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#2,949
of 8,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,874
of 103,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#14
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,177 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,607 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.