| Title |
The effect of mother’s age and other related factors on neonatal survival associated with first and second birth in rural, Tanzania: evidence from Ifakara health and demographic surveillance system in rural Tanzania
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2393-14-240 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Majige Selemani, Mathew A Mwanyangala, Sigilbert Mrema, Amri Shamte, Dan Kajungu, Abdallah Mkopi, Michael Johnson Mahande, Rose Nathan |
| Abstract |
With a view to improve neonatal survival, data on birth outcomes are critical for planning maternal and child health care services. We present information on neonatal survival from Ifakara Health and Demographic Surveillance System (HDSS) in Tanzania, regarding the influence of mother's age and other related factors on neonatal survival of first and second births. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 25% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | 13% |
| Sweden | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Uganda | 1 | <1% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 165 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 29 | 17% |
| Researcher | 21 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 28 | 16% |
| Unknown | 44 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 25% |
| Social Sciences | 27 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 26 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 24 | 14% |
| Unknown | 42 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2017.
All research outputs
#2,442,175
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#651
of 4,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,556
of 239,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#20
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,828 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,760 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.