↓ Skip to main content

From selfish auctioning to incentivized marketing

Overview of attention for article published in Autonomous Robots, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
From selfish auctioning to incentivized marketing
Published in
Autonomous Robots, July 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10514-014-9403-2
Authors

Lantao Liu, Dylan A. Shell, Nathan Michael

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 5%
Unknown 21 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 36%
Researcher 5 23%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Student > Master 3 14%
Librarian 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 1 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 8 36%
Engineering 6 27%
Mathematics 3 14%
Arts and Humanities 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 2 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2014.
All research outputs
#17,723,634
of 22,758,963 outputs
Outputs from Autonomous Robots
#391
of 518 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,250
of 229,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Autonomous Robots
#17
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,963 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 518 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,485 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.