↓ Skip to main content

Listening to locals on payments for environmental services

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Environmental Management, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
353 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Listening to locals on payments for environmental services
Published in
Journal of Environmental Management, February 2010
DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.01.002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lisa Petheram, Bruce M. Campbell

Abstract

Payments for Environmental Services (PES) is gaining recognition worldwide as a serious option for conservation of ecosystems, as well as potentially improving the livelihoods of people providing environmental services. However, little attention has been paid to research on views of local people in their potential roles as service providers. In this research we explore perspectives of poor people living in a National Park in Vietnam, where introduction of PES is being considered. In-depth interviews and workshops were conducted - with strong emphasis on the use of visual techniques, to help facilitate learning processes and provide insight into local perspectives. From the research, two models were developed to indicate general factors that influence the likelihood of people adopting, and adhering to, PES schemes. We suggest these models can be used to guide the design of PES. Our findings also reveal three main requirements important in design of pro-poor PES: (1) Thorough scoping studies for ensuring that schemes are based on sound understanding of potential providers' perspectives and context. (2) Such studies should emphasise qualitative research and draw on participatory tools, to facilitate open dialogue and co-learning by researchers and participants. (3) Policy makers should consider designing hybridized schemes, i.e., in which PES concepts are combined with integrated conservation and development.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 353 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 1%
United States 4 1%
Portugal 3 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Malaysia 2 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Other 10 3%
Unknown 321 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 70 20%
Student > Master 66 19%
Researcher 61 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 20 6%
Other 74 21%
Unknown 38 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 127 36%
Social Sciences 48 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 45 13%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 18 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 11 3%
Other 53 15%
Unknown 51 14%