| Title |
The evolutionary ecology of nut dispersal
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Botanical Review, January 2001
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02857850 |
| Authors |
Stephen B. Vander Wall |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 321 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 3% |
| Brazil | 9 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 2% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| Sweden | 3 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Panama | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 15 | 5% |
| Unknown | 269 | 84% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 67 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 55 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 49 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 22 | 7% |
| Professor | 20 | 6% |
| Other | 65 | 20% |
| Unknown | 43 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 177 | 55% |
| Environmental Science | 60 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Engineering | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 16 | 5% |
| Unknown | 51 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 225. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2023.
All research outputs
#164,487
of 24,829,155 outputs
Outputs from The Botanical Review
#1
of 316 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128
of 118,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Botanical Review
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,829,155 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 316 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 118,009 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them