You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Muscle functional MRI as an imaging tool to evaluate muscle activity.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, September 2011
|
| DOI | 10.2519/jospt.2011.3586 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Barbara Cagnie, James M Elliott, Shaun O'Leary, Roseline D'hooge, Nele Dickx, Lieven A Danneels |
| Abstract |
Muscle functional magnetic resonance imaging (mfMRI) is an innovative technique that offers a noninvasive method to quantify changes in muscle physiology following the performance of exercise. The mfMRI technique is based on signal intensity changes due to increases in the relaxation time of tissue water. In contemporary practice, mfMRI has proven to be an excellent tool for assessing the extent of muscle activation following the performance of a task and for the evaluation of neuromuscular adaptations as a result of therapeutic interventions. This article focuses on the underlying mechanisms and methods of mfMRI, discusses the validity and advantages of the method, and provides an overview of studies in which mfMRI is used to evaluate the effect of exercise and exercise training on muscle activity in both experimental and clinical studies. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Luxembourg | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 116 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 22 | 18% |
| Researcher | 21 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 20 | 16% |
| Unknown | 19 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 29% |
| Sports and Recreations | 22 | 18% |
| Engineering | 12 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 10% |
| Unknown | 27 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2021.
All research outputs
#15,170,530
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy
#1,797
of 2,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,903
of 136,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy
#15
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.1. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,064 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.