↓ Skip to main content

Safety and efficacy of a multiphase dietetic protocol with meal replacements including a step with very low calorie diet

Overview of attention for article published in Endocrine, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Safety and efficacy of a multiphase dietetic protocol with meal replacements including a step with very low calorie diet
Published in
Endocrine, July 2014
DOI 10.1007/s12020-014-0355-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sabrina Basciani, Daniela Costantini, Savina Contini, Agnese Persichetti, Mikiko Watanabe, Stefania Mariani, Carla Lubrano, Giovanni Spera, Andrea Lenzi, Lucio Gnessi

Abstract

To investigate safety, compliance, and efficacy, on weight loss and cardiovascular risk factors of a multiphasic dietary intervention based on meal replacements, including a period of very low calorie diet (VLCD) in a population of obese patients. Anthropometric parameters, blood tests (including insulin), dual-energy-X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and questionnaires for the assessment of safety and compliance before and after (phase I) a 30-day VLCD, 700 kcal/day, normoproteic, 50 g/day carbohydrate, four meal replacements; (phase II) a 30-day low calorie diet (LCD), 820 kcal/day, three meal replacements plus a protein plate; (phase III) 60-day LCD, 1,100 kcal/day, two meal replacements plus two protein plates and reintroduction of small amounts of carbohydrates; (phase IV) 60-day hypocaloric balanced diet (HBD), 1,200 kcal/day, one meal replacement, two protein plates and the reintroduction of carbohydrates. 24 patients (17 females, 7 males, mean BMI 33.8 ± 3.2 kg/m(2), mean age 35.1 ± 10.2 years) completed the study. The average weight loss was 15.4 ± 6.7 %, with a significant reduction of fat mass (from 32.8 ± 4.7 to 26.1 ± 6.3 % p < 0.05) and a relative increase of lean mass (from 61.9 ± 4.8 to 67.1 ± 5.9 % p < 0.05). An improvement of metabolic parameters and no variations of the liver and kidney functions were found. A high safety profile and an excellent dietary compliance were seen. The VLCD dietary program and the replacement dietary system described here is an effective, safe, and well-tolerated treatment for weight control.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Other 6 10%
Researcher 6 10%
Student > Master 5 8%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 19 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 15%
Psychology 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Energy 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 23 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2018.
All research outputs
#1,311,681
of 24,985,232 outputs
Outputs from Endocrine
#59
of 1,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,921
of 235,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Endocrine
#3
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,985,232 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,871 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,368 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.