↓ Skip to main content

Tillage pedogenesis of purple soils in southwestern China

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Mountain Science, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Tillage pedogenesis of purple soils in southwestern China
Published in
Journal of Mountain Science, May 2009
DOI 10.1007/s11629-009-1038-y
Authors

Xiubin He, Yuhai Bao, Hongwei Nan, Donghong Xiong, Li Wang, Yanfeng Liu, Jingbo Zhao

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 17%
Student > Master 4 17%
Professor 3 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 5 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 26%
Environmental Science 5 22%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 6 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2014.
All research outputs
#15,303,056
of 22,758,963 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Mountain Science
#126
of 218 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,952
of 92,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Mountain Science
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,963 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 218 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,604 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them