↓ Skip to main content

A selective working memory impairment after transcranial direct current stimulation to the right parietal lobe

Overview of attention for article published in Neuroscience Letters, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
googleplus
28 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
117 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
270 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A selective working memory impairment after transcranial direct current stimulation to the right parietal lobe
Published in
Neuroscience Letters, June 2010
DOI 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.05.087
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marian E. Berryhill, Elaine B. Wencil, H. Branch Coslett, Ingrid R. Olson

Abstract

The role of the posterior parietal cortex in working memory (WM) is poorly understood. We previously found that patients with parietal lobe damage exhibited a selective WM impairment on recognition but not recall tasks. We hypothesized that this dissociation reflected strategic differences in the utilization of attention. One concern was that these findings, and our subsequent interpretation, would not generalize to normal populations because of the patients' older age, progressive disease processes, and/or possible brain reorganization following injury. To test whether our findings extended to a normal population we applied transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to right inferior parietal cortex. tDCS is a technique by which low electric current applied to the scalp modulates the resting potentials of underlying neural populations and can be used to test structure-function relationships. Eleven normal young adults received cathodal, anodal, or sham stimulation over right inferior posterior parietal cortex and then performed separate blocks of an object WM task probed by recall or recognition. The results showed that cathodal stimulation selectively impaired WM on recognition trials. These data replicate and extend our previous findings of preserved WM recall and impaired WM recognition in patients with parietal lobe lesions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 270 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 3%
Italy 3 1%
Germany 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 246 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 55 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 51 19%
Student > Master 36 13%
Student > Bachelor 27 10%
Student > Postgraduate 18 7%
Other 54 20%
Unknown 29 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 122 45%
Neuroscience 35 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 7%
Engineering 8 3%
Other 23 9%
Unknown 41 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2016.
All research outputs
#1,324,493
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Neuroscience Letters
#125
of 7,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,151
of 105,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuroscience Letters
#3
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,756 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,068 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.