| Title |
Immunonutrition in critically ill patients: a systematic review and analysis of the literature
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, July 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-008-1213-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paul E. Marik, Gary P. Zaloga |
| Abstract |
The role of immuno-modulating diets (IMDs) in critically ill patients is controversial. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 196 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | 2% |
| Brazil | 4 | 2% |
| South Africa | 3 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 181 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 29 | 15% |
| Other | 27 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 25 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 10% |
| Professor | 16 | 8% |
| Other | 52 | 27% |
| Unknown | 27 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 127 | 65% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Unknown | 33 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2022.
All research outputs
#4,008,222
of 23,376,718 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,092
of 5,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,150
of 82,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#5
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,376,718 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,064 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,236 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.