You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The ambivalence of ordinary cosmopolitanism: Investigating the limits of cosmopolitan openness
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Sociological Review, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1467-954x.2007.00750.x |
| Authors |
Zlatko Skrbis, Ian Woodward |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 27% |
| Australia | 3 | 20% |
| Chile | 1 | 7% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 87% |
| Scientists | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 107 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 14% |
| Researcher | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 22 | 19% |
| Unknown | 20 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 61 | 54% |
| Arts and Humanities | 9 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 6% |
| Psychology | 5 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 21 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2016.
All research outputs
#2,951,109
of 23,752,589 outputs
Outputs from The Sociological Review
#584
of 1,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,900
of 422,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Sociological Review
#70
of 226 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,752,589 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,502 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,358 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 226 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.