| Title |
Moth species richness, abundance and diversity in fragmented urban woodlands: implications for conservation and management strategies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-014-0753-z |
| Authors |
Paul R. Lintott, Nils Bunnefeld, Elisa Fuentes-Montemayor, Jeroen Minderman, Lorna M. Blackmore, Dave Goulson, Kirsty J. Park |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 38% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Guinea | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
| Scientists | 4 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | <1% |
| Ghana | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 149 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 16% |
| Researcher | 24 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 9% |
| Unknown | 33 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 70 | 44% |
| Environmental Science | 34 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 1% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Unknown | 39 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2014.
All research outputs
#6,527,980
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#964
of 2,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,188
of 232,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#14
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,075 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.