↓ Skip to main content

Supportive evidence for 11 loci from genome-wide association studies in Parkinson's disease

Overview of attention for article published in Neurobiology of Aging, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Supportive evidence for 11 loci from genome-wide association studies in Parkinson's disease
Published in
Neurobiology of Aging, November 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2012.10.019
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lasse Pihlstrøm, Gunnar Axelsson, Kari Anne Bjørnarå, Nil Dizdar, Camilla Fardell, Lars Forsgren, Björn Holmberg, Jan Petter Larsen, Jan Linder, Hans Nissbrandt, Ole-Bjørn Tysnes, Eilert Öhman, Espen Dietrichs, Mathias Toft

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies have identified a number of susceptibility loci in sporadic Parkinson's disease (PD). Recent larger studies and meta-analyses have greatly expanded the list of proposed association signals. We performed a case-control replication study in a Scandinavian population, analyzing samples from 1345 unrelated PD patients and 1225 control subjects collected by collaborating centers in Norway and Sweden. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms representing 18 loci previously reported at genome-wide significance levels were genotyped, as well as 4 near-significant, suggestive, loci. We replicated 11 association signals at p < 0.05 (SNCA, STK39, MAPT, GPNMB, CCDC62/HIP1R, SYT11, GAK, STX1B, MCCC1/LAMP3, ACMSD, and FGF20). The more recently nominated susceptibility loci were well represented among our positive findings, including 3 which have not previously been validated in independent studies. Conversely, some of the more well-established loci failed to replicate. While future meta-analyses should corroborate disease associations further on the level of common markers, efforts to pinpoint functional variants and understand the biological implications of each risk locus in PD are also warranted.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 68 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 27%
Researcher 10 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 4%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 18 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 13%
Neuroscience 7 10%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 20 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2014.
All research outputs
#6,526,425
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Neurobiology of Aging
#2,237
of 4,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,831
of 192,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurobiology of Aging
#14
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,418 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,733 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.