↓ Skip to main content

Scaling Down: The Subnational Comparative Method

Overview of attention for article published in Studies in Comparative International Development, March 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
540 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
568 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Scaling Down: The Subnational Comparative Method
Published in
Studies in Comparative International Development, March 2001
DOI 10.1007/bf02687586
Authors

Richard Snyder

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 568 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 22 4%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Other 8 1%
Unknown 527 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 203 36%
Student > Master 69 12%
Researcher 57 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 54 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 33 6%
Other 80 14%
Unknown 72 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 429 76%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 14 2%
Arts and Humanities 11 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 8 1%
Psychology 5 <1%
Other 17 3%
Unknown 84 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2020.
All research outputs
#3,451,248
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Studies in Comparative International Development
#87
of 366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,784
of 44,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Studies in Comparative International Development
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 366 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 44,018 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.