↓ Skip to main content

Cost-effectiveness of strategies to improve the utilization and provision of maternal and newborn health care in low-income and lower-middle-income countries: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
12 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
460 Mendeley
Title
Cost-effectiveness of strategies to improve the utilization and provision of maternal and newborn health care in low-income and lower-middle-income countries: a systematic review
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2393-14-243
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lindsay Mangham-Jefferies, Catherine Pitt, Simon Cousens, Anne Mills, Joanna Schellenberg

Abstract

Each year almost 3 million newborns die within the first 28 days of life, 2.6 million babies are stillborn, and 287,000 women die from complications of pregnancy and childbirth worldwide. Effective and cost-effective interventions and behaviours for mothers and newborns exist, but their coverage remains inadequate in low- and middle-income countries, where the vast majority of deaths occur. Cost-effective strategies are needed to increase the coverage of life-saving maternal and newborn interventions and behaviours in resource-constrained settings.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 460 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Unknown 456 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 102 22%
Researcher 63 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 10%
Student > Postgraduate 28 6%
Student > Bachelor 28 6%
Other 93 20%
Unknown 99 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 125 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 82 18%
Social Sciences 54 12%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 26 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 3%
Other 43 9%
Unknown 118 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2022.
All research outputs
#2,301,772
of 25,380,459 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#603
of 4,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,273
of 235,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#19
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,380,459 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,765 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,764 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.