↓ Skip to main content

Digital health, microfluidics, and bedside genetic testing

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Cytogenetics, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Digital health, microfluidics, and bedside genetic testing
Published in
Molecular Cytogenetics, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1755-8166-7-s1-i55
Pubmed ID
Authors

Syed Hashsham

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 56%
Student > Master 2 11%
Professor 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 2 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 11%
Environmental Science 2 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 11%
Social Sciences 2 11%
Other 3 17%
Unknown 3 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2014.
All research outputs
#20,657,128
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Cytogenetics
#251
of 423 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#243,531
of 321,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Cytogenetics
#19
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 423 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,172 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.