↓ Skip to main content

Can ornamental potted plants remove volatile organic compounds from indoor air? — a review

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Science and Pollution Research, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
11 Wikipedia pages
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
127 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
273 Mendeley
Title
Can ornamental potted plants remove volatile organic compounds from indoor air? — a review
Published in
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, July 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11356-014-3240-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Majbrit Dela Cruz, Jan H. Christensen, Jane Dyrhauge Thomsen, Renate Müller

Abstract

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are found in indoor air, and many of these can affect human health (e.g. formaldehyde and benzene are carcinogenic). Plants affect the levels of VOCs in indoor environments, thus they represent a potential green solution for improving indoor air quality that at the same time can improve human health. This article reviews scientific studies of plants' ability to remove VOCs from indoor air. The focus of the review is on pathways of VOC removal by the plants and factors affecting the efficiency and rate of VOC removal by plants. Laboratory based studies indicate that plant induced removal of VOCs is a combination of direct (e.g. absorption) and indirect (e.g. biotransformation by microorganisms) mechanisms. They also demonstrate that plants' rate of reducing the level of VOCs is influenced by a number of factors such as plant species, light intensity and VOC concentration. For instance, an increase in light intensity has in some studies been shown to lead to an increase in removal of a pollutant. Studies conducted in real-life settings such as offices and homes are few and show mixed results.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 273 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 268 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 17%
Student > Bachelor 44 16%
Student > Master 30 11%
Researcher 29 11%
Student > Postgraduate 13 5%
Other 40 15%
Unknown 71 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 56 21%
Environmental Science 42 15%
Engineering 38 14%
Chemistry 9 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 2%
Other 37 14%
Unknown 85 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2024.
All research outputs
#727,612
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
#102
of 11,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,769
of 243,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
#4
of 139 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,212 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,972 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 139 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.