Title |
Cancer: disease and nutrition are key determinants of patients’ quality of life
|
---|---|
Published in |
Supportive Care in Cancer, March 2004
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00520-003-0568-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Paula Ravasco, Isabel Monteiro-Grillo, Pedro Marques Vidal, Maria E. Camilo |
Abstract |
The aims of this study were (1) to evaluate quality of life (QoL), nutritional status and dietary intake taking into account the stage of disease and therapeutic interventions, (2) to determine potential interrelationships, and (3) to quantify the relative contributions of the cancer, nutrition and treatments on QoL. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chile | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 182 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 45 | 24% |
Student > Bachelor | 25 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 13% |
Researcher | 22 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 6% |
Other | 28 | 15% |
Unknown | 30 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 72 | 39% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 5% |
Psychology | 8 | 4% |
Other | 26 | 14% |
Unknown | 35 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2018.
All research outputs
#6,875,825
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Supportive Care in Cancer
#1,624
of 5,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,885
of 63,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Supportive Care in Cancer
#6
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,061 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 63,347 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.