| Title |
Appealing Features of Vocational Support Services for Hispanic and non-Hispanic Transition Age Youth and Young Adults with Serious Mental Health Conditions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11414-014-9402-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rosalie A. Torres Stone, Jonathan Delman, Colleen E. McKay, Lisa M. Smith |
| Abstract |
Transition age youth and young adults (TAYYAs) diagnosed with serious mental health conditions (SMHCs) are at greater risk of being unemployed compared to their peers without SMHCs. Job counseling and job placement services are the greatest predictor of competitive employment, yet we have limited knowledge about what TAYYAs believe they need to obtain gainful employment. In person, qualitative interviews were conducted with 57 non-Hispanic and Hispanic TAYYAs with SMHCs enrolled in three vocational support programs in MA (Vocational Rehabilitation, Individual Placement and Support; the Clubhouse Model as described by the International Center for Clubhouse Development). Six themes emerged from the data: three themes were identified as social capital (supportive relationships, readily available workplace supports, and vocational preparation), two themes related to human capital (effective educational supports and work experience), and one theme related to cultural capital (social skills training). Unique features (Spanish-speaking staff and/or familiar in Latino culture, familial-like staff support) were frequently noted by Hispanic TAYYAs. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 133 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 14% |
| Researcher | 17 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 27 | 20% |
| Unknown | 28 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 33 | 25% |
| Social Sciences | 27 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Unknown | 34 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2017.
All research outputs
#16,109,035
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research
#398
of 529 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,901
of 237,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 529 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,173 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.