You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Quality assurance of the international computerised 24 h dietary recall method (EPIC-Soft)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of Nutrition, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1017/s0007114513002766 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sandra P. Crispim, Genevieve Nicolas, Corinne Casagrande, Viktoria Knaze, Anne-Kathrin Illner, Inge Huybrechts, Nadia Slimani |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 56 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 29% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 10 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 16% |
| Unknown | 15 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2023.
All research outputs
#2,129,093
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Nutrition
#1,142
of 6,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,969
of 211,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Nutrition
#15
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,361 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,141 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.