↓ Skip to main content

Polyphenols, Inflammation, and Cardiovascular Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Current Atherosclerosis Reports, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#15 of 859)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
13 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
267 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
380 Mendeley
Title
Polyphenols, Inflammation, and Cardiovascular Disease
Published in
Current Atherosclerosis Reports, March 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11883-013-0324-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christy C. Tangney, Heather E. Rasmussen

Abstract

Polyphenols are compounds found in foods such as tea, coffee, cocoa, olive oil, and red wine and have been studied to determine if their intake may modify cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Historically, biologic actions of polyphenols have been attributed to antioxidant activities, but recent evidence suggests that immunomodulatory and vasodilatory properties of polyphenols may also contribute to CVD risk reduction. These properties will be discussed, and recent epidemiological evidence and intervention trials will be reviewed. Further identification of polyphenols in foods and accurate assessment of exposures through measurement of biomarkers (i.e., polyphenol metabolites) could provide the needed impetus to examine the impact of polyphenol-rich foods on CVD intermediate outcomes (especially those signifying chronic inflammation) and hard endpoints among high risk patients. Although we have mechanistic insight into how polyphenols may function in CVD risk reduction, further research is needed before definitive recommendations for consumption can be made.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 380 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 372 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 58 15%
Student > Master 58 15%
Student > Bachelor 52 14%
Researcher 38 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 6%
Other 50 13%
Unknown 100 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 75 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 40 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 36 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 18 5%
Other 53 14%
Unknown 135 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 105. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2024.
All research outputs
#398,522
of 25,371,292 outputs
Outputs from Current Atherosclerosis Reports
#15
of 859 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,594
of 203,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Atherosclerosis Reports
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,292 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 859 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,740 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them