↓ Skip to main content

Effective treatment with intravenous immunoglobulins reduces autoreactive T-cell response in patients with CIDP

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effective treatment with intravenous immunoglobulins reduces autoreactive T-cell response in patients with CIDP
Published in
Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry, July 2014
DOI 10.1136/jnnp-2014-307708
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juliane Klehmet, Jos Goehler, Lena Ulm, Siegfried Kohler, Christian Meisel, Andreas Meisel, Hendrik Harms

Abstract

To investigate changes in autoreactive T-cell responses against PMP-22 and P2 antigen as well as a T-cell memory repertoire in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) induced by repeated intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 41 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 23%
Researcher 7 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 11%
Other 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 7 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 45%
Neuroscience 5 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 7%
Psychology 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 9 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2015.
All research outputs
#8,185,927
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry
#3,529
of 7,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,479
of 239,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry
#52
of 294 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,402 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,833 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 294 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.